Friday, February 18, 2011

Question on Sin, Confession, & Sainthood?

Here's a question emailed to me by a friend well acquainted with the grace life we have in Christ, followed by my response. 'Always a blessing for me to get to participate in what God is doing in the life and ministry of those God is working in and through!

Send your questions to mike@StoneLife.org, or connect via twitter, facebook, or skype video below.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mike,

This morning, my wife and I read 1 John 1:8-2:2. After reading this passage, she was left with questions. As I read the passage, I must admit that I am a little confused. I see the potential for a legalistic sermon dripping from this text. Because I know John understands grace, I am trying to read these verses with a grace perspective, but I am getting tripped up on the word, "sin." Is John saying that we still have flesh; therefore, we have the potential for sin, and if we try to hide our potential for sin, we are deceiving ourselves? Also, I see the confessing of our "sins" as a confession that we have flesh and that it is only through Christ that flesh can be overcome (sanctification). In 1 John 2:1, John states that he wrote this epistle so that we will not sin, but I am of the belief that we cannot, in our own strength, keep from sinning. So, praise God that He chose to die for the atoning of our sin(s), which is grace (1 John 2:1b-2)
Am I on the right path or did I miss the boat. I would appreciate your thoughts.
Thanks,
-Saint-not-a-Sinner?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Sainted -

'Absolutely on the right path - actually very exciting to see your commentary/questions, Brother!

Let's define a couple of terms:

Sin is our nature BEFORE Christ or our behavior now when acting AS IF still our nature, though it isn't - many believers don't know our sinful nature was crucified with Christ (aka. "the flesh" still resident in the believer, but not our ID / independence from God).

Confession is our agreement with God about our behavior or - more specifically - about our TRUE nature (ala "that sinfulness is NOT who I truly am by grace!").

If we walk in the Truth of who we are in Christ - that is, LET by faith Him LIVE by grace through me - I will not sin... Paul states several times that when we walk by the Spirit we won't gratify the desires of the flesh.

Keep in mind John is not Paul, John's paradigm IS still accurate, but it's representative in part of a pre-crucified experience with Christ. So, John has a greater emphasis on sinful behavior and intimacy than Paul, whose emphasis is on new identity and finished work. Both are accurate and they are in agreement, but with slightly different perspectives.

Hope that helps! Very proud of God's work in you, Bro!

ridiculously graced...
-mike.

p.s.
Had one final thought on this, though not directly in response to your question. It's also important to realize in reading "if we confess... He forgives," and "if we say we don't sin... we're saying God's a liar," that John is setting up two contradictory conditions of mankind: either you know you've sinned, or you say you don't sin - the self-righteous or the grace dependent. Those of us who rely on grace are forgiven. Those who are self-righteous are at odds with God who has offered us grace. In other words, if we say we don't need grace then we nullify the work of Christ - in our opinion He died for nothing. John is not speaking of a believer stumbling, but describing the choice of dependence on Him for righteousness (thus, "He is faithful... to cleanse us from all unrighteousness), versus those who claim they need no such grace and are deliberately choosing to operate in faith in our own justification instead of His for us.

Still make sense? :)

ridiculously graced...
-mike.



Connect via FaceBook /Twitter / Skype: "MikeQDaniel"

1 comment:

  1. I really like this discussion, and this issue has come up a few times in various Bible studies I have been in. I like the analogy of being adopted as a son or daughter into the royal family of a kingdom, where the members of the royal family are not subject to the law. Once we accept the position of adoption, we are no longer bound to the law because we are part of the royal family. Yet we have declared our desire to submit to a very good king who not only wants us to be good ambassadors for the kingdom, but also desires for everyone's ultimate good. Doing something that is "wrong" according to the law is not condemning for us because we are part of the royal family, yet embracing or participating in those things that are against the law will generally not present us as good ambassadors for the kingdom, and often hurts others who our king cares for - in other words all things are permissible, but not all things are profitable (as Paul said) - where we *now* naturally define "profitable" in terms of what is glorifying for the kingdom. It is now our nature to care about what is profitable for the kingdom because we have, by our own will, declared that we are submitting to the sovereignty of our good king and placed our trust in him. When we do participate in something that is not profitable for the kingdom, whether specifically against the law or not, it goes against what we are now part of - the kingdom under a good king, and we naturally regret it and desire repentance. Part of the reason we desire repentance is because it breaks our relationship with our king, and it is now in our nature to desire that relationship. Many times the Bible tells us (and psychologists say this as well) that the way we restore relationship is by confession, which leads to reconciliation - and that holds true whether it's with other people or our good king. Ultimately, we are not confessing to breaking a law that we are accountable to, but rather, we are confessing to something that we recognize was not profitable for the kingdom despite the fact that we previously declared our submission to our king and our desire for the good of the kingdom, and also because we know that our actions have consequently caused damage to our relationship with him - just as it would with anyone we hurt or break a commitment to. We confess because we desire to: restore our relationship with our king (and others), reaffirm our commitment to our king, and to resubmit ourselves to his sovereignty. Living in a loving father-child relationship with our king is who we were created to be, who Christ restored us to be, and by grace is our true identity as adopted members of the kingdom. The ability to restore/reconcile our relationship with our king is a major part of what we have been given through our adoption, and we do that through confession - so confession is in essence a gift we are allowed to use to restore relationship under the new covenant, whereas sacrifices and confession were required under the old covenant of the law.

    Well, that's my long-winded analogy in the little time I have to put it in writing. Comments from Mike or others are welcome....

    -David

    ReplyDelete